American tobacco company declare woman smoker compensate for to pass away 7100 ten thousand dollars

American tobacco company declare woman smoker compensate for to pass away 7100 ten thousand dollars
According to December 14 of American media, the intersection of state and one jury, Massachusetts of U.S.A., decide famous the intersection of tobacco company and Rui Luo draw Germany Company women family of smoker compensate to pass away by one the same day 7100 ten thousand dollar ( About 4.7 hundred million yuan) ,The reason is that this company counted to once seduce into with the cigarette gift ten years ago to have only at that time 9 -year-old she smoke.
Jury decide tobacco company to pass away woman Evans of smoker Mary compensating compensation 5000 ten thousand dollars, she son 2100 Ten thousand U.S. dollars. The court inquests holding the punishment compensation for damage of this case on the 16th, so compensation total value may rise by a wide margin.
This claims first Luo Rui draws Germany Company to utilize " L The new harbour " R The case of descendants' market of the a few clan that the cigarette gift is opened, " L The new harbour " It is a kind of more popular peppermint cigarette in black community. The jury thinks, it is a kind of omission to send the cigarette gift with charge free for Mary and other black children, and claim this company has denied the danger of smoking for many years. 2002, 54 -year-old Mary suck more than 40 years " L The new harbour " R Die of lung cancer after the cigarette. Several weeks before deading, she records the next section of videos and claims to receive the cigarette gift at the age of 9 by oneself, she changes candies with these cigarettes at the beginning, she begins to smoke these gifts at the age of 13.
The judicial expert says, the difference of judgements of this jury lies in, though the government has been criticizing the distribution means in the past of tobacco company all the time, but usually court and jury are unwilling to be partial to the smoker sueing the tobacco company, because they think smokers should shoulder some responsibility.
In the court, the plaintiff thinks Mary too small at that time, does not know the danger of smoking, she later on craving for tobacco really too large so that unable to give up, certainly, she oneself take for the intersection of loss and any responsibility this.
|